<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Viewing Stats- Week of 7/14/08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drdarindavis.com/2008/07/20/viewing-stats-week-of-71408/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drdarindavis.com/2008/07/20/viewing-stats-week-of-71408/</link>
	<description>Minnesota independent pro wrestler discusses past experiences and the current state of pro wrestling</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 03:21:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: drdarindavis</title>
		<link>http://drdarindavis.com/2008/07/20/viewing-stats-week-of-71408/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>drdarindavis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drdarindavis.wordpress.com/?p=127#comment-216</guid>
		<description>The thing is, at least a few years ago the spikes in the ratings for the wrestling programs were always while somebody was on the mic(I think they get ratings numbers in quarter hours).

With a few exceptions, I rarely want to hear somebody cut a 10 minute promo, but there are apparently enough people that do. My guess is that the spikes were more likely from people flipping channels.

They can get in a rut where if something worked to increase ratings then more of it must be good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is, at least a few years ago the spikes in the ratings for the wrestling programs were always while somebody was on the mic(I think they get ratings numbers in quarter hours).</p>
<p>With a few exceptions, I rarely want to hear somebody cut a 10 minute promo, but there are apparently enough people that do. My guess is that the spikes were more likely from people flipping channels.</p>
<p>They can get in a rut where if something worked to increase ratings then more of it must be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guido</title>
		<link>http://drdarindavis.com/2008/07/20/viewing-stats-week-of-71408/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Guido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drdarindavis.wordpress.com/?p=127#comment-215</guid>
		<description>The problem is content is expensive.

As a related example: American gladiators has what, 6 stunts done per hour show, most lasting only 1 minute?  But it&#039;s a 60 minute show...  The cost of doing an hour of stunts is huge, considering the variation they throw it.  Thus, noise instead of good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is content is expensive.</p>
<p>As a related example: American gladiators has what, 6 stunts done per hour show, most lasting only 1 minute?  But it&#8217;s a 60 minute show&#8230;  The cost of doing an hour of stunts is huge, considering the variation they throw it.  Thus, noise instead of good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://drdarindavis.com/2008/07/20/viewing-stats-week-of-71408/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drdarindavis.wordpress.com/?p=127#comment-214</guid>
		<description>I agree with you. Some shows(most) and a lot of other programs have a lot of worthless fillers. If they had  lots of complaints, some changes might be made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you. Some shows(most) and a lot of other programs have a lot of worthless fillers. If they had  lots of complaints, some changes might be made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

